Even seasoned real-estate professionals may have issues regarding the precise purpose of guarantees and how to ensure that you obtain one that adequately safeguards you and your assets.
By taking a closer look to assist with this difficulty, I can understand what they represent with a few reasons why we might need them and why we might not.
It is by managing the three major types of guarantees encountered in each real estate transaction. These include payment guarantees, completion guarantees, and bad boy assurances carveout guarantees.
Bad Boy Guarantee
The bad boy guarantee was to maintain the integrity of borrowing companies and their owners.
When discovered that the collateral’s worth had dropped below the expectation or that debtors had withdrawn money out of the property before failure, many lenders who relied on the assets to recover a mortgage loan found themselves in a difficult situation.
If these occurred, a guarantee recourse held lenders and their guarantors accountable for the losses sustained by the lender.
The guiding idea behind this guarantee is that employees frequently prioritize their interests over those of their employers.
By guaranteeing that the sponsor protects their interests first and creating disincentives to act differently, the warranty ensures the sponsorship acts in the best interests of the lender or investor.
To avoid defeating the original aim, avoid using a corporate guarantor as the guarantor if you detect a bad boy promise. In rare circumstances, a single-purpose entity (SPE) made with the site in question as the sole asset.
It might provide the appearance of a guarantee, but there is none because the only asset the investment is backed by is the item itself.
Almost every loan you encounter will often have a bad guy guarantee.
Funders want to ensure that their well-crafted loan agreement and structure are adhered to after going to the expense of creating them.
By effectively guaranteeing that the debtor won’t be responsible as long as they adhere to the conditions of the agreement, the guarantee of recourse reduces this concern.
Here are a few examples of what defines poor behavior regarding a promise breach and how they could cause issues for sponsors since bad boy guarantees are much more common than other options accessible.
The most frequent one is filing for bankruptcy.
Recently, there’s been some high-profile court proceedings where the sponsor determined that filing for bankruptcy was the best course of action for safeguarding investor interests. Perhaps by delaying the foreclosure process by filing bankruptcy, the borrower held out hope to protect investor interests by weathering a downturn until values rose.
As a result of their fiduciary obligation to its investors, the sponsor will get forced to file for bankruptcy; nevertheless, they discovered that this resulted in liability to the lender under the bad boy guarantee.
Another classic “bad boy” clause might force the borrower (the sponsor) to contribute to replacements or interest reserves.
The bad boy clauses may make the sponsor personally accountable if they don’t comply with these conditions.
Payment Assurance
Usually, the borrower’s assets serve as collateral for a payment guarantee.
Usually, the value of these assets must be at least equal to the loan amount.
The asset value regarding the loan amount can compute in two ways: using the borrower statement from the mortgage application and utilizing an audited declaration, which is more challenging and less common for borrowers.
Theoretically, a borrower may promise the same collateral on many loans, thereby rendering one worthless in contrast to the others because these assurances are not listed.
As a result, they might offer less protection than other forms of assurance.
Completeness Assured
A completion guarantee ensures that developers must see a project to completion as one of the loan’s requirements.
The completion guarantee is ofttimes given by the general contractor rather than the sponsor directly.
In these situations, they are frequently paid a fee for project completion.
Here, it’s essential to consider which party the completion guarantee’s counterparty is.
The developer frequently participates in high development transactions.
In these circumstances, they are frequently paid a fee for ensuring project completion.
What to Consider When Examining Guarantees
Anyone considering investing in a loan with a sponsor through a syndicated crowdfunding agreement should thoroughly examine the guarantees and think about the following:
- This assurance of what kind?
- Who is providing the assurance?
- Will this assurance be upheld in court?
- What method is needed to verify the assets?
In this case, asset verification by a third party is crucial.
Nobody will voluntarily make you whole for a guarantee violation and admit it to you, and it might be challenging to enforce a promise.
Multiple state-level safeguards for sponsors and existing shareholders are challenging to work with and can make it extremely hard to collect on a guarantee, particularly for assurances in real estate.
Guarantees and the related risk of the lawsuit are frequently enough of a motivator to get parties to the negotiation table and work out their issues.
As the last point, investors must read the tiny print because so many clauses in a guarantee are negotiable.
When faced with these circumstances, a bank would ensure a thorough grasp of the specifics of a deal’s assurances, and wise investors should do the same.
******************************
Come join us! Email me at mark@dolphinpi.us to find out more about our next real estate investment.