When starting on real estate, it is understandable to have various assumptions regarding the matter. Whatever the concern might be, just remember it can go both ways. Various trends in real estate often change, and it is highly possible that what you wanted will not necessarily be the outcome. Real estate has always been a numbers game, and intuition often isn’t your friend in this field. This article includes ways to evaluate your project to lessen the possible risks and how to get rid of these assumptions to have a better guarantee on profits.
The Guarantee of Profits
While it is acceptable to want a high return on a real estate investment, investors should be aware of the underlying assumptions that underpin a sponsor’s projections. The prospect of enormous earnings in a real estate business may easily entice investors.
Underpromising and overdelivering are how trustworthy, competent sponsors manage expectations to build long-term relationships with investors.
The temptation to change assumptions to improve predicted returns in comparison to rival projects might arise from the battle for investor funds on the new platforms that crowdfunding websites provide.
It may result in projection inflation, where the sponsor seeking the most money from investors is one with the highest predicted profits.
Investors must distinguish between a sponsor who is aggressive with the figures and one who is conservative because, let’s face it, most sponsors will claim they are taking a cautious approach to the data.
Investors can address this dilemma by digging deeper into the sponsor’s underlying assumptions.
Three Essential Metrics for Project Evaluation
Various assumptions used in predictions, but the rate of return (IRR), cash on cash, and equity multiple are the three most often used measures on which assumptions have the most impact.
The time value of money is taken into account by the IRR when calculating returns.
It is by adding net funds from an exit to cash flow distribution from operations, compounding it over time to provide a return.
Technically speaking, the return rate is what remains after the initial investment’s net present value has been discounted down to zero.
Because cash on cash is only the after-debt service dividend from operations divided by the initial equity investment, it is considerably simpler to calculate and comprehend.
Some individuals consider it to be a dividend yield.
The total payouts, including exit proceeds and return on investment, are divided by the initial venture called the equity multiple.
All three are crucial measures of the projected cash flow that a building will provide, with many assumptions that guide the computations and produce projected returns.
However, it is feasible to significantly change the returns that investors are presented by fiddling with the assumptions.
Getting Rid of the Assumptions
Moving to the financial summary and looking at the pro forma (projected) cash flow – the net operating income (NOI) – is an excellent start when examining a new product because this drives everything.
There is no set format, but the papers will always be financial forecasts. When there, the cap rates utilized are crucial assumptions studied thoroughly.
The net operating income separated by the property’s purchase price or total cost of acquisition and development to determine the cap rate.
It is comparable to the cash on cash return but varies in that only non-levered figures are used to compute it.
The market cap rate for the type of property and the cap rate the sponsor anticipates the market can bear when they sell are the two most significant cap rates to pay attention.
You should anticipate rising cap rate assumptions if you think interest rates will increase in the future.
A (really) cautious sponsor will anticipate a greater departure cap rate than the going-in cap rate or, at their most aggressive, the same, even if they are not connected.
Assumptions for Stress Testing
It is not to say that some situations, sponsors can get excellent discounts on real estate by purchasing properties with high cap rates and selling them at a reduced cap rate.
But if a sponsor buys a property at a 7% cap rate and then expects this will sell at a 5% cap rate within a few years, that assumption significantly affects return estimates and calls for further research.
A sponsored project out several years and anticipates that each year cap rates will rise, with the implication that pricing would fall, yet expected returns are still enticing, maybe make (really) cautious assumptions.
Similarly, in rare instances, sponsors may utilize dropping rent assumptions when they check a recession during the project’s hold period.
Whether they are correct or not, they are ready to include falling revenue estimates in their predictions is grounds for hope that they are avoiding the urge to inflate figures to impress investors.
Another critical component that has affected predicted profits is the length of time a sponsor devotes to their transaction life cycle.
For example, assuming a 6.5 percent exit cap rate may result in a 16 percent IRR, and a 6 percent cap rate may result in a 25 percent IRR.
Similarly, planning for a four-year leave will result in much better IRR returns than a five-year retirement.
Best practices require sponsors to stress test their assumptions and disclose the results to investors.
Look for matrices that compare various cap rates and transaction cycles, and ask the sponsor what they consider to be the best, worst, and most likely circumstances.
If these are congruent with your expectations for how a transaction will unfold, this might cause optimism that you and the sponsor are on the same page or that the proposed project is worth further investigation.
******************************
Come join us! Email me at mark@dolphinpi.us to find out more about our next real estate investment.