Real estate developers use Waterfall calculations to compute payouts to investors over the life cycle of a project. Since the advent of real estate crowdfunding, there have been considerable alterations in how they are organized, with significant repercussions.
As the proverbial tail wags the dog, one tendency involves investors dictating how sponsors underwrite and market their projects, while another relates to the co-investment a sponsor makes in a project to align interests with investors. As you will see in this essay when these two elements converge, the price is pushed higher by a hyper-supply of liquidity, the risk grows, and the cycle enters its final stages.
Display the IRR!
In the earliest recovery stages of real estate cycles, after recessions and downturns, investors are tempted back into the market with the promise of better profits to compensate for the perceived extra risk. Moreover, the possibility of participating in ‘distressed’ properties offered at discounts to peak values stimulates investors who anticipate more enormous profits based on the attractive price.
As the economy improves, the frequency of opportunistic investments decreases, and returns had anticipated to fall progressively. Despite this, sponsors continue to attract investors since profit margins shrink for everyone when the market finds equilibrium.
The paradox of real estate crowdfunding is that the IRR drives investor choices to participate in particular transactions. Institutional and other skilled investors recognize that returns fall as the cycle lengthens and adjust their expectations appropriately; crowd investors, collectively, do not — at least not yet.
Retail investors, individuals who enter real estate investment through crowdfunding platforms, indicate to sponsors that they have a distinct perspective. Recent investor studies on some of the most prominent crowdfunding platforms revealed that investors are primarily motivated by IRR – the more significant, the better. Crowdfunding websites anecdote that projects with the greatest estimated IRRs tend to have considerably more excellent webinar attendance, indicating that investors are pursuing maximum profits even if they are out of proportion to expected.
Contrary to the current phase of the cycle, this is incorrect. However, sponsors are aware that to attract crowd investors, they must provide projects with the greatest relative IRRs or risk losing investors to a competing deal if they do not.
As a result, there is a hurry to match with IRR headline figures. Sponsors in crowdfunding are aware that the winner is the sponsor with the highest IRR: This may encourage sponsors to “stretch” underwriting assumptions to get more extensive headline IRR statistics to attract naïve investors: Which results in an artificial inversion of the IRR curve, as rivalry for investor money pushes higher predicted IRRs in the latter stages of the business cycle. As a result, the market is clearly in a state of overheating.
The Principle of Decreasing Co-Investment
The co-investment sponsors make to projects is a second oddity as the market begins its final ascent. Co-investment is the personal risk capital that a sponsor commits to a project to match their interests with those of investors.
Investor Management Services (IMS), the industry leader in investment management software, has observed that the amount of co-investment by sponsors in projects fluctuates with the market cycle. In the early phases of a recovery, when perceived risk is higher but actual danger is lower, it is prudent to take precautions; sponsors must contribute more to guarantee that investors and their interests are more closely aligned.
IMS finds that sponsors are needed to invest less and less of their own money as risk rises inexorably towards the cycle’s conclusion when pricing approaches peak levels and supply swings towards hyper-supply circumstances.
Bubble Blooming
As these two causes, irrational IRR inflation and diminished sponsor co-investment, converge, expectations grow, sponsor and investor incentives become mismatched, risks increase, and prices rise — typical signs of the last phases of a building bubble.
To mitigate the danger of falling victim to these dynamics, investors may focus on a sponsor’s qualifications, especially their experiences during previous recessions, and avoid the urge to seek just the project with the most significant, most dazzling IRR estimates. The best projects may be those with lower IRRs since their sponsors adopt a cautious approach as the end of the cycle approaches. These projects may be the most likely to weather the coming slump.
Concerned with the current state of the market, investors are becoming more selective with their capital allocations. Addressing these and other investor concerns is the foundation of successful and sustainable capital raising and the only way to accomplish it since rules changed to allow it is online.
******************************
Come join us! Email me at mark@dolphinpi.us to find out more about our next real estate investment.